| aw |
|
Institute
of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University |
| |
|
 |
Selected
Publications - Abstracts |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Clarke,
A.C., Burtenshaw, M.K., McLenachan, P.A., Erickson, D.L., and D.
Penny.
2006. Reconstructing the Origins and Dispersal of the Polynesian Bottle
Gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Mol. Biol. Evol.
23(5):893–900.
Abstract:
The origin of the Polynesian
bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), an important crop species
in prehistoric Polynesia, has
remained elusive. Most recently, a South American origin has been favored
as the bottle gourd could have been introduced from this continent with
the sweet potato by Polynesian voyagers around A.D. 1,000. To test the
hypothesis of an American origin for the Polynesian bottle gourd, we developed
seven markers specific to bottle gourd (two chloroplast and five nuclear).
The nuclear markers were developed using a new technique where polymorphic
inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers are converted into single-locus
polymerase chain reaction and sequencing markers—an approach that
will be useful for developing markers in other taxa. All seven markers
were sequenced in 36 cultivars of bottle gourd from Asia, the Americas,
and Polynesia. The results support a dual origin for the Polynesian bottle
gourd: the chloroplast markers are exclusively of Asian origin, but the
nuclear markers show alleles originating in both the Americas and Asia.
Because hybridization of Polynesian bottle gourds with post-European introductions
cannot be excluded, ancient DNA from archaeological material will be useful
for further elucidating the prehistoric movements of this species in Polynesia.
This work has implications not only for the dispersal of the Polynesian
bottle gourd but also for the domestication and dispersal of the species
as a whole.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Hurles,
M.E., Matisso-Smith, E., Gray, R.D., and Penny, D. (2003). Untangling
Oceanic settlement: the edge of the knowable. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 18(10): 531-540.
Abstract:
Human expansion into the far reaches of the Pacific has occurred within
the past 3000–4000 years. This is so recent that it is arguably
the best opportunity to test models of the origin and dispersal of human
groups and their domesticated plants and animals, cultural and linguistic
evolution, human impacts on a pristine environment, and the lower limits
for a long-term sustainable population. Multidisciplinary research is
essential because these models must account for archaeological, ecological,
cultural, historical, social, linguistic and (both mitochondrial and nuclear)
genetic data. This synthesis has not yet been achieved for any settlement
in the world, but there has been considerable progress recently on integrating
these disciplines with respect to the settlement of Polynesia.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
E.
Matisoo-Smith, R. M. Roberts, G.J. Irwin, J.S. Allen, D. Penny. and D.M.
Lambert. 1998. Patterns of prehistoric human mobility in Polynesia indicated
by mtDNA from the Pacific rat. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, USA. 95: 15145-15150.
Abstract:
Human settlement of Polynesia was a major event in world prehistory. Despite
the vastness of the distances covered, research suggests that prehistoric
Polynesian populations maintained spheres of continuing interaction for
at least some period of time in some regions. A low level of genetic variation
in ancestral Polynesian populations, genetic admixture (both prehistoric
and post-European contact), and severe population crashes resulting from
introduction of European diseases make it difficult to trace prehistoric
human mobility in the region by using only human genetic and morphological
markers. We focus instead on an animal that accompanied the ancestral
Polynesians on their voyages. DNA phylogenies derived from mitochondrial
control-region sequences of Pacific rats (Rattus exulans) from
east Polynesia are presented. A range of specific hypotheses regarding
the degree of interaction within Polynesia are tested. These include the
issues of multiple contacts between central east Polynesia and the geographically
distinct archipelagos of New Zealand and Hawaii. Results are inconsistent
with models of Pacific settlement involving substantial isolation after
colonization and confirm the value of genetic studies on commensal species
for elucidating the history of human settlement.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
R.
P. Murray-McIntosh, B. J. Scrimshaw, P. J. Hatfield and D. Penny. 1998.
Testing migration patterns and estimating founding population size in
Polynesia by using human mtDNA sequences. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences USA. 95:9047-9052.
Abstract:The
hypervariable 1 region of human mtDNA shows markedly reduced variability
in Polynesians, and this variability decreases from western to eastern
Polynesia. Fifty four sequences from New Zealand Maori show that the mitochondrial
variability with just four haplotypes is the lowest of any sizeable human
group studied and that the frequency of haplotypes is markedly skewed.
The Maori sequences, combined with 268 published sequences from the Pacific,
are consistent with a series of founder effects from small populations
settling new island groups. The distributions of haplotypes were used
to estimate the number of females in founding population of New Zealand
Maori. The three-step simulation used a randomly selected founding population
from eastern Polynesia, an expansionary phase in New Zealand, and finally
the random selection of 54 haplotypes. The results are consistent with
a founding population that includes '70 women (between 50 and 100), and
sensitivity analysis shows that this conclusion is robust to small changes
in haplotype frequencies. This size is too large for models postulating
a very small founding population of ‘‘castaways,’’
but it is consistent with a general understanding of Maori oral history
as well as the results of recent canoe voyages recreating early trans-oceanic
voyages.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
D.
Penny, M. A. Steel, P. J. Waddell, and M. D. Hendy. 1995. Improved analyses
of human mtDNA sequences support a recent African origin for Homo sapiens.
Molecular Biology Evolution 12:863-882.
Abstract:
New quantitative methods are applied to the 135 human mitochondrial sequences
from the Vigilant et al. data set. General problems in analyzing
large numbers of short sequences are discussed, and an improved strategy
is suggested. A key feature is to focus not on individual trees but on
the general “landscape” of trees. Over 1,000 searches were
made from random starting trees with only one tree (a local optimum) being
retained each time, thereby ensuring optima were found independently.
A new tree comparison metric was developed that is unaffected by rearrangements
of trees around many very short internal edges. Use of this metric showed
that downweighting hypervariable sites revealed more evolutionary structure
than studies that weighted all sites equally. Our results are consistent
with convergence toward a global optimum. Crucial features are that the
best optima show very strong regional differentiation, a common group
of 49 African sequences is found in all the best optima, and the best
optima contain the 16 !Kung sequences in a separate group of San people.
The other 86 sequences form a heterogeneous mixture of Africans, Europeans,
Australopapuans, and Asians. Thus all major human lineages occur in Africa,
but only a subset occurs in the rest of the world. The existence of these
African-only groups strongly contradicts multiregional theories for the
origin of Homo sapiens that require widespread migration and
interbreeding over the entire range of H. erectus. Only when
the multiregional model is rejected is it appropriate to consider the
root, based on a single locus, to be the center of origin of a population
(otherwise different loci could give alternative geographic positions
for the root). For this data, several methods locate the root within the
group of 49 African sequences and are thus consistent with the recent
African origin of H. sapiens. We demonstrate that the time of
the last common ancestor cannot be the time of major expansion in human
numbers, and our results are thus also consistent with recent models that
differentiate between the last common ancestor, expansion out of Africa,
and the major expansion in human populations. Such a two-phase model is
consistent with a wide range of molecular and archeological evidence.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|