| |
Allan
Wilson (1934-1991) was a pioneer in the use of molecular
approaches to understand evolutionary change and reconstruct
phylogenies. He was one of the most controversial figures
in post-war biology; his work attracted a great deal of
attention both from within, and outside, the academic world.
Allan Wilson was born in Ngaruawahia, New Zealand, and raised
on a farm at Helvetia, Pukekohe. He attended King's College
in Auckland and excelled in maths and chemistry. After school
he gained a BSc from Otago University. It was here as a
Masters student that Wilson met Professor C.P. 'Mac' McMeekan,
a New Zealand pioneer in animal science. He suggested that
Wilson further his study in biochemistry instead of genetics.
In 1955 Wilson was invited to do his PhD at the University
of California, Berkeley. At the time the family thought
Allan would only be gone two years; instead he stayed at
Berkeley for 35 years, gaining his PhD in 1961 under the
direction of Arthur Pardee, and setting up one of the world's
most creative biochemistry labs and turning ideas of evolution
on their ear.
Allan Wilson first came to world attention when he published
a paper titled 'Immunological Time-Scale For Human Evolution'
in Science magazine in December 1967. Together with doctoral
student Vince Sarich, Wilson argued that the origins of
the human species could be seen through, what he termed,
a 'molecular clock'. This was a way of dating, not from
fossils, but from the genetic mutations that had accumulated
since they parted from a common ancestor. The molecular
clock estimated the length of time from divergence, given
a certain rate of change.
When Wilson and Sarich analysed and compared genetic material
of humans and chimpanzees, they found the material to be
99 percent identical. From this, using the 'molecular clock'
reasoning (bigger differences equate to greater time since
their last common ancestor) they deduced that the earliest
proto-hominids evolved only five million years ago. Most
contemporary anthropologists, who favoured a date of around
25 million years, dismissed his work as absurd.
In the early 1980s, as his findings for the age of the proto-humans
were starting to be more widely accepted, Wilson again dropped
a bombshell on traditional anthropological thinking with
his best known work with Rebecca Cann and Mark Stoneking
on the so-called "Mitchocondrial Eve" hypothesis. In his
efforts to identify informative genetic markers for tracking
human evolutionary history, he started to focus on mitochondrial
DNA (mtDNA) - genes that sit in the cell, but not in the
nucleus, and are passed from mother to child. This DNA material
is important because it mutates quickly, thus making it
easy to plot changes over relatively short time spans. By
comparing differences in the mtDNA Wilson believed it was
possible to estimate the time, and the place, modern humans
first evolved. With his discovery that human mtDNA is genetically
much less diverse than chimpanzee mtDNA, he concluded that
modern human races had diverged recently from a single population
while older human races such as Neanderthal, Java
erectus and Pekin erectus had become extinct.
He and his team compared mtDNA in people of different racial
backgrounds and concluded that all modern humans evolved
from one 'lucky mother' in Africa about 200,000 years ago.
This finding was as, if not more, controversial than his
1967 findings. Accepted thinking had various human groups
evolving from different ancestors, over a million years
in separate geographic regions, but at basically the same
rate around the world. In Europe with Homo sapiens
Neanderthals, in Indonesia with Java Man, in China with
Peking Man. Again, like in the 1960s, many palaeontologists
rejected Wilson's conclusions; fossil scientists were unfamiliar
with biochemistry and trusted their own data more than molecular
data. It took 20 years to convince palaeontologists of the
value of Wilson's theory, but when they did, it married
their science with that of genetics. It was Wilson's legacy
to turn genetics from a study of inherited traits into a
biochemical science.
Wilson's success can at least partially be attributed to
his willingness to adopt new molecular techniques at the
earliest stages of their development. For instance, he was
one of the first scientists to apply DNA sequencing and
PCR to the study of evolution. Throughout the course of
his career, Wilson trained more than 200 graduate students
and post-docs in molecular evolutionary biology. Indeed,
his laboratory was a virtual obligatory passage point for
anyone wishing to do empirical work in the field of molecular
evolution in the 1970s and 1980s.
His investigations into the origins of humanity through
biochemistry were revolutionary, yet at the time of his
death in July 1991, while undergoing treatment for leukaemia,
he was still a controversial figure. His theories on the
evolution and age of modern humans still flew in the face
of some anthropological thinking of the time, not to mention
inciting anger from American creationists.
One of the great innovators of science, New Zealander Allan
Wilson revolutionised the study of human evolution. He was
short listed for the Nobel Prize and is the only New Zealander
to win the prestigious US MacArthur "Genius" Award. Allan
Wilson's scientific achievements are nothing short of profoundly
significant.
After Wilson's death Charles Laird published some thoughts
on his lost colleague and friend.
"I
have wondered about the parts of his personality that were
so unusual even among first-rate scientists - his courage,
his openness, his ability to focus on a problem and not
let go, his special vision to see the final experiment and
not to get distracted by intermediate ones and the details
in between…"
Information
sourced from:
|